Distributed Robotics Group
The Distributed Robotics Group studies and develops protocols for onchain robotics — examining how decentralized coordination, blockchain infrastructure, and robots and physical AI intersect to create new classes of protocol design challenges. Building one robot is an engineering challenge; getting two or more to coordinate is a protocol problem.
Associated Project
- YakRobot Protocols — real-hardware testbed for onchain coordination protocols, developed within DRG
Meeting Archive — 3 sessions
-
July 9, 2026EIP-8126 specification and requirementsRobot verification methods and approachesVerification criteria and validation standardsDistributed robotics authentication mechanisms
Participants: anurajenp
The Distributed Robotics Group held their third meeting to review EIP-8126 and discuss robot verification mechanisms. The meeting prompt called for general commentary on the EIP alongside exploration of various robot verification approaches, implementation methods, and what specific aspects of robot systems require validation. The discussion centered on understanding the verification landscape for distributed robotic systems and how to establish trust and authenticity within the network.
- The meeting focused on evaluating EIP-8126 as a framework for robot verification within distributed systems, examining both the technical specification and practical implementation approaches.
- Multiple verification methodologies were under consideration to establish identity and authenticity of robots in the DRG ecosystem.
- Key verification concerns include determining what robot attributes and capabilities require validation and establishing appropriate verification protocols.
View discussion in Discord →Links discussed -
June 25, 2026ERC-8004 standard and trustless agent identity frameworkThree on-chain registries: Identity, Reputation, and ValidationApplication of trustless agent identity to physical robots vs software agentsProtocol design for distributed robotics coordination
Participants: anurajenp, _vgr, jdbb
The DRG group held a study session focused on ERC-8004, an Ethereum standard for trustless agent identity. The meeting began with preparation materials including the ERC specification, GitHub repository, and explanatory blog post. Participants were scheduled to meet on June 25, 2026 at 16:30 UTC in the Whitehead room for a structured learning session. The agenda called for 25 minutes of silent reading and study of the ERC-8004 standard, with particular emphasis on its three core on-chain registry components: Identity, Reputation, and Validation layers. A central theme for discussion was exploring what trustless agent identity means in the context of physical robots operating in the distributed robotics space, as opposed to traditional software agents, and understanding the implications for robot coordination and trust establishment.
- ERC-8004 introduces a trustless identity layer specifically designed for agents, requiring examination of how this applies to physical robotic systems rather than just software agents.
- The standard implements three distinct on-chain registry components (Identity, Reputation, Validation) that work together to establish trust without central intermediaries.
- A core discussion point is how the concept of trustless identity fundamentally differs when applied to physical robots that exist in the real world versus purely digital agents.
View discussion in Discord →Links discussed -
June 11, 2026Group formation and member onboarding for Distributed Robotics GroupSurvey deployment to understand participant backgrounds and experience levelsArchitecture evaluation criteria and module selection philosophyStack technology choices and open-source alignment preferencesFull-stack opinions vs. constraints in system design
Participants: anurajenp, _vgr, rafa_0x
The Distributed Robotics Group held its inaugural kickoff meeting on June 11, 2026. The session focused on onboarding new members and establishing foundational processes for the group's work. Organizers distributed a brief survey to gather information about participants' backgrounds, experience levels, interests in robotics, and preferred working styles, with results intended to inform the group's agenda and office hour scheduling over the coming months.
Key discussion centered on establishing evaluation criteria for architectural decisions and module selection. While acknowledging that the protocol itself may remain agnostic to many technology stack choices, participants argued for developing rubrics that reflect the group's philosophical alignment with open-source and community-driven solutions. The group recommended maintaining strong full-stack opinions on architecture even when not imposing hard constraints, preferring solutions like open-source VPN alternatives to proprietary options when capabilities are equivalent.
- The group developed a background survey to understand member interests, hardware/software experience, and robotics work preferences to shape the agenda and organize office hours.
- A rubric for evaluating modules was proposed as a valuable artifact, even when the protocol itself remains agnostic to stack choices, to ensure philosophical alignment with group values.
- Open-source alternatives are preferred over proprietary solutions when other factors are equal (e.g., open VPN alternatives over Tailscale).
- The group should maintain full-stack opinions on architectural choices even when not enforcing full-stack constraints or commitments.
View discussion in Discord →Links discussed
Interested in joining? Join the Discord community →